UPDATE
The recent lynching of a poor
Muslim at Bisada near Dadri for allegedly possessing beef has been justified as
being a matter of religious passion but it also transpires that the poor family
got the beef from butchers who kill stray cattle that makes the meat very
cheap. Religious sentiments had earlier triggered the meat ban imposed during the
Jain festivities though the Bombay High Court passed an interim order lifting
the ban imposed by a municipal corporation. The Jains then came to the Supreme
Court where Justices Thakur and Kurian bluntly told them "a meat ban
cannot be forced down citizens' throats... be tolerant to diversity."
Although there is nothing remotely
spiritual in the things people eat beef has become a red rag igniting
unprecedented communal fury.The bigots need to however
understand that there is much more to beef than just sentiment. The image of
`Gaomata’... the white `Mother Cow’ with soulful eyes ... is beloved to many
Hindus but the RSS, BJP and other opponents of cow slaughter would be shocked
to know that cows account for only 12% of all the bovines in India. They are
not also the main producers of milk because female buffaloes account for 66% of
India’s milch cattle that produce over 75% of the milk.
The recent 19th Livestock Census of
India, 2012 also shows that India’s cows and other female bovines are in no
great danger. This census shows that their numbers increased by 7.16% to 216
million since the previous census of 2007. It is the males of the species that
are threatened as their numbers declined by 18.6% to 84 million in the same
period. As male bovines today account for just 30% of the cattle population it
clearly shows that it is the bulls and not cows that are being butchered.
Cattle are a huge economic asset to almost
every rural family and the meat industry including bovines, sheep, goats, pigs
and poultry put money into the pockets of nearly every rural household and they
will suffer great economic loss if the India’s legislators ban or restrict the
slaughter and sale of meat products. Some 40% of the value of livestock comes
from meat. Beef, that costs a third of mutton, is also the poor man’s protein and
is consumed by some 200 million Dalits and other tribal communities. Religious
ideologues do not understand that there will be a strong political backlash if
religious sentiments take precedence over economic realities. Anyone familiar
with rural India knows that while there are many Muslims in the meat business
the majority are Hindu.
The census clearly shows that two-thirds of
India’s cattle are female. This is because the value of male bovines that used
to be valuable as draft animals or for meat is declining very rapidly. Few
people are aware that it is male animals (or birds) that are mostly used for
meat as the females are more valuable as breeders and for milk or eggs. If
males are not being used for ploughing or transport they are only useful for
their meat or hides. This gender imbalance is increasing rapidly and a recent
report from the Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering Bhopal shows that
the share of draught animals for farm power on Indian farms declined from 44%
in 1971-72 to a shocking 4% in 2012-13 as tractors and electric and diesel
pumps had replaced them. Bullock carts are now rare in many rural areas.
The census data shows that millions of male
animals have been quietly culled. Male buffaloes declined 17.8% to 16 million
while females increased 7.99% to 92 million. There are therefore nearly 6
female buffaloes to every male. It is only in the states where beef is being eaten
that this gender imbalance is less pronounced. Paradoxically, the keepers of
India’s cattle themselves perpetuate the worst cruelties against cattle. As the
females are valuable and the males are worthless but they need food and fodder
that costs over Rs. 100 a day. They are therefore killed for meat where it is
allowed but in other states they are callously driven away to be devoured by
dogs or wild animals.
Several million pregnant female bovines are
brought into Indian cities for fresh milk. Half the calves they deliver are
males that are an economic liability so they are callously killed as soon as
the milking steadies. They are not humanely slaughtered but are usually tied in
the sun to slowly die of thirst and hunger. Meat from stray cattle are the cheapest meat in India. The state wise data shows that that
economic compulsions outweigh religious sentiment in almost all urban and rural
areas despite claims to the contrary.
India also has a serious problem with roughly
80 million old and unproductive cattle that are callously driven away until
they die of hunger or illness. They do not harmlessly forage on barren land
but, driven by hunger, raid productive farms and face the wrath of farmers who
mercilessly beat and even kill them. They are a huge economic liability that
takes food and economic opportunities away from millions of needy people. India’s
299 million cattle also need roughly 30 million hectares for their grazing as
well as an equal amount of additional land for their fodder requirements. This
is a huge chunk out of India’s 190 million hectares of cropped land. If states
legislate against beef consumption if will add many more unproductive cattle
demanding land that is not available.
There is no Hindu scripture that is opposed
to the eating of meat or even beef. In fact Indra, the tawny bearded supreme Vedic
god, was specifically offered the best sides of beef. The Vedas, Mahabharat,
Ramayana, Shastras and other ancient texts all endorse eating meat and beef was
even specified as the daan, or offering, reserved for Brahmins.
The sentiment against beef is essentially political and not religious. There had been no problem with beef eating till 1870. It was soon to become a defining icon of Hindu and Muslim identity. Cow protection became a religious statement when
the first movement to protect the cow was started by the Sikh Kuka (Namdhari)
sect in 1870. In 1882, Dayanand Saraswati founded the Gorakshini Sabha that
challenged beef eating provoking a series of communal riots in the 1880’s and
1890’s. These led to further communal clashes where many were killed in
Azamgarh in 1893, Ayodhya in 1912 and Shahabad in 1917. Beef eating thus quickly
moved from being a matter of diet to an icon of Hindu versus Muslim
identity. Hindu chauvinism could however also make the ban on beef into an symbol
of Brahmin tyranny over Dalits for whom beef is their main protein source. There
is a strong religious sentiment but politicians as well as officials, and
intellectuals need to consider this complex subject before rushing into hasty legislation.
About 40% of the economic value of livestock is from the sale of meat. If the sale of meat or beef is banned the livelihoods of some 100 million of India's poorest mainly rural families will be devastated. They already face problems with GM seeds and a widespread drought and this may tip lakhs of them into suicides.
About 40% of the economic value of livestock is from the sale of meat. If the sale of meat or beef is banned the livelihoods of some 100 million of India's poorest mainly rural families will be devastated. They already face problems with GM seeds and a widespread drought and this may tip lakhs of them into suicides.
Please share this mail with all your friends so that it reaches the religious bigots and make them reconsider the full impact of banning beef.
No comments:
Post a Comment